Diagnostic accuracy of alpha and beta angles measured by transperineal ultrasound for stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250737Keywords:
Stress urinary incontinence, Transperineal ultrasound, Alpha angle, Beta angle, Diagnostic accuracy, Meta-analysisAbstract
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition among women that significantly impacts their quality of life. Transperineal ultrasound has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic modality for assessing pelvic floor dysfunction in SUI, with alpha and beta angles proposed as potential markers of urethral and bladder neck mobility. However, variability in findings across studies necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of their diagnostic utility. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of alpha and beta angles measured by transperineal ultrasound in differentiating women with SUI from controls. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was conducted to identify relevant studies. Nine studies with 1,157 participants (584 with SUI and 573 controls) were included. The pooled mean differences in alpha and beta angles between SUI and control groups were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and potential publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis. The pooled mean alpha angle was significantly larger in the SUI group, with a mean difference of 15.77° (95% CI: 9.62, 21.91; I²=93%), indicating altered urethral mobility during the Valsalva maneuver. Similarly, the pooled mean beta angle was significantly higher in the SUI group, with a mean difference of 21.18° (95% CI: 12.11, 30.25; I²=95%), reflecting greater bladder neck descent. Despite substantial heterogeneity, the findings consistently support the diagnostic value of these ultrasound parameters. In conclusion, alpha and beta angles measured via transperineal ultrasound are significantly larger in women with SUI, highlighting their potential as non-invasive markers for pelvic floor dysfunction. However, variability in imaging protocols and patient characteristics underscores the need for standardization to enhance diagnostic accuracy. These findings support the incorporation of ultrasound measurements into clinical assessments for SUI.
Metrics
References
Qiu Z, Li W, Huang Y, Huang W, Shi X, Wu K. Urinary incontinence and health burden of female patients in China: Subtypes, symptom severity and related factors. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022;22(3):219-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14350
Li S, Wang Z, Yang L, Liu S, Jing L, Hong L. Factors Associated with the Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Elderly Women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2025;52(1):25690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/CEOG25690
Falah-Hassani K, Reeves J, Shiri R, Hickling D, McLean L. The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:501-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04622-9
Yang X, Wang X, Gao Z, Li L, Lin H, Wang H, et al. The anatomical pathogenesis of stress urinary incontinence in women. Medicina. 2022;59(1):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010005
Kobashi KC, Vasavada S, Bloschichak A, Hermanson L, Kaczmarek J, Kim SK, et al. Updates to surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): AUA/SUFU guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023;209(6):1091-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003435
Li X, Zhang L, Li Y, Jiang Y, Zhao C, Fang S, et al. Assessment of perineal body properties in women with stress urinary incontinence using Transperineal shear wave elastography. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):21647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72429-5
Zhuang Y, Yao L, Liu Y. Value of transperineal three-dimensional ultrasonography in diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction. Br J Radiol. 2024;97(1163):1799-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae145
Chang CY, Loo ZX, Lin KL, Sung IC, Long CY. The Association of Ultrasound Parameters with De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence following Transvaginal Mesh Surgery. 2024 (Preprint). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4596667/v1
Omar FF, Abdel Mageed NE. Multiparametric Study of Transperineal Ultrasound in Evaluating Females With Stress Urinary Incontinence. Egypt J Med Res. 2024;5(3):63-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2023.234099.1456
Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x
Jefferson FA, Linder BJ. Evaluation and Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2024;99(11):1802-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.07.003
Agostini S, Bertelli E, Verna S, Lattavo L, Mastrorosato M. Imaging in Bladder Dysfunctions. Non-Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunctions. 2021;159-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57393-5_14
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29:372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Al-Saadi WI. Transperineal ultrasonography in stress urinary incontinence: The significance of urethral rotation angles. Arab J Urol. 2016;14(1):66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.003
Keshavarz E, Pouya EK, Rahimi M, Bozorgan TJ, Saleh M, Tourzani ZM, et al. Prediction of stress urinary incontinence using the retrovesical (β) angle in transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(8):1485-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15526
Li YQ, Geng J, Tan C, Tang J, Yang X. Diagnosis and classification of female stress urinary incontinence by transperineal two-dimensional ultrasound. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(5):859-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-160786
Lu R, Zhang Y, Dai FR, Yu YP. Application of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasonography in the diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2018;98(33):2675-7.
Shi Q, Wen L, Zhao B, Huang S, Liu D. The association of hiatal dimensions and urethral mobility with stress urinary incontinence. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(3):671-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15748
Turkoglu A, Coskun AD, Arinkan SA, Vural F. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(1):70-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.1100
Yin Y, Xia Z, Feng X, Luan M, Qin M. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography for diagnosis of female occult stress urinary incontinence. Med Sci Monitor. 2019;25:8078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917086
Zhao B, Wen L, Chen W, Qing Z, Liu D, Liu M. A preliminary study on quantitative quality measurements of the urethral Rhabdosphincter muscle by supersonic shear wave imaging in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(8):1615-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15255
Zhao B, Wen L, Liu D, Huang S. Urethral configuration and mobility during urine leaking described using real-time transperineal ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2021;41(1):171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21058
Zhuo Z, Ye Z, Zhang J, Yu H. Correlation between three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and pelvic floor electromyography in women with stress urinary incontinence. Ginekologia Polska. 2023;94(1):25-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2022.0117
El Hemaly AK, Mousa LA, Kurjak A, Kandil IM, Serour AG. Pelvic floor dysfunction, the role of imaging and reconstructive surgery. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;7(1):86-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1274
Dalpiaz O, Curti P. Role of perineal ultrasound in the evaluation of urinary stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodynamics. 2006;25(4):301-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20261
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
