Analyzing the impact of blood collection errors on patient safety and clinical outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250220Keywords:
Blood collection errors, Patient safety, Diagnostic accuracy, Pre-analytical errors, Quality improvementAbstract
Errors in blood collection processes pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems, contributing to diagnostic inaccuracies, compromised patient safety, and adverse clinical outcomes. Pre-analytical errors, including patient misidentification, improper labeling, hemolysis, and sample contamination, are among the most common sources of laboratory mistakes. These errors can delay diagnosis, lead to unnecessary medical interventions, and increase healthcare costs. Misidentification and labeling errors, for example, have been linked to life-threatening outcomes in transfusion medicine, while hemolysis often results in falsely elevated laboratory values that can mislead clinical decision-making. Effective strategies to address blood collection errors include leveraging technological innovations, such as barcoding systems and automated labeling, which have demonstrated success in reducing mislabeling incidents. Adherence to standardized guidelines, including protocols established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), plays a crucial role in maintaining sample integrity. Additionally, phlebotomy training programs and competency assessments ensure that healthcare staff consistently follow best practices, minimizing errors during the collection process. Quality management tools, including Six Sigma and Lean methodologies, further enhance laboratory processes by identifying root causes of errors and implementing targeted improvements. Patient engagement also contributes to error prevention, with informed and active participation serving as an additional safeguard against potential mistakes. The integration of these strategies has shown promise in improving diagnostic reliability and reducing the clinical and economic burden of blood collection errors. By addressing systemic, procedural, and technological factors, healthcare systems can ensure safer and more accurate diagnostic practices, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary focus remains essential for achieving sustainable improvements in blood collection processes and mitigating risks associated with pre-analytical errors.
Metrics
References
Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010;47(2):101-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2009.009222
Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48(5):691-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691
Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53(7):1338-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344
Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1881-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333
Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):750-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.123
Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(5):330-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.5.330
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clin Lab. 2006;52(5-6):217-30.
Simundic A-M, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase–a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochemia Medica. 2012;22(2):145-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.017
Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Quality Safety. 2013;22(2):21-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615
Murphy M, Stanworth S, Yazer M. Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement. Vox Sanguinis. 2011;100(1):46-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01366.x
Simundic A-M, Baird G, Cadamuro J, Costelloe SJ, Lippi G. Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020;57(1):1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2019.1664391
Favaloro EJ, Lippi G. Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(3):309-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061
Singh H, Schiff GD, Graber ML, Onakpoya I, Thompson MJ. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Quality Safety. 2017;26(6):484-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005401
Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(5):2-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001
Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2001;8(4):299-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2001.0080299
Goodnough LT, Shander A. Patient blood management. Survey Anesthesiol. 2012;56(6):278-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SA.0000422039.22134.87
Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335(7609):24-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80