Neurosensory feedback and its role in restorative dentistry enhancing patient comfort
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250052Keywords:
Dental implants, Neurosensory feedback, Patient comfort, Restorative dentistry, Sensory preservationAbstract
Neurosensory feedback plays a critical role in restorative dentistry, directly influencing the precision of procedures and the comfort experienced by patients. It involves the transmission of sensory signals from the oral tissues to the brain, enabling clinicians to adapt techniques based on patient-specific responses. This process is essential in minimizing procedural discomfort and ensuring functional outcomes, particularly in complex interventions such as dental implants, crowns and endodontic treatments. Mechanoreceptors within the periodontal ligament and pulp provide real-time feedback, guiding adjustments to occlusion, alignment and prosthetic fit. Challenges arise due to variability in neurosensory responses influenced by factors like age, prior trauma and systemic conditions. The absence of natural sensory interfaces, such as the periodontal ligament in dental implants, further complicates the restoration process. While Osseo perception compensates to an extent, its limitations often affect the fine-tuning of occlusion and tactile control. Innovations in biomaterials and surgical techniques have addressed some of these concerns by enhancing compatibility and preserving nerve pathways. However, inflammatory reactions and postoperative sensory disturbances remain common complications. Emerging technologies, such as cone-beam computed tomography and tactile sensors, offer improved diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, aiding in the management of neurosensory impairments. Despite their promise, accessibility and cost continue to pose significant barriers, limiting widespread adoption. Research into biocompatible materials and neural regeneration strategies holds potential for further advancing restorative dentistry. Emphasizing patient-centered care through preoperative counseling and meticulous technique adaptation can enhance satisfaction and comfort. Overcoming the limitations of neurosensory integration requires a multidisciplinary approach involving clinicians, researchers and material scientists to ensure that restorative procedures achieve both functional and sensory excellence while prioritizing patient well-being.
Metrics
References
Magrin GL, Sigua-Rodriguez EA, Goulart DR, Asprino L. Piezosurgery in bone augmentation procedures previous to dental implant surgery: a review of the literature. The open dentistry journal. 2015;9:426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010426
Torabinejad M, Goodacre CJ. Endodontic or dental implant therapy: the factors affecting treatment planning. The journal of the american dental association. 2006;137(7):973-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0318
Pavlíková G, Foltán R, Horká M, Hanzelka T, Borunská H, Šedý J. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2011;40(5):451-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.013
Briso ALF, Rahal V, Azevedo FAd, et al. Neurosensory analysis of tooth sensitivity during at-home dental bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2018;26:e20170284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0284
Deliverska EG, Petkova M. Complications after extraction of impacted third molars-literature review. Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2016;22(3):1202-1211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2016223.1202
Hennequin M, Faulks D, Veyrune J, Bourdiol P. Significance of oral health in persons with Down syndrome: a literature review. Developmental Medicine and child neurology. 1999;41(4):275-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162299000596
Samran A. The influence of ferrule height and substance loss on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars: an in vitro study 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.003
Papalexopoulos D, Samartzi T-K, Sarafianou A. A thorough analysis of the endocrown restoration: a literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(4):422-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3075
Ananthan S, Patil AG, Jaiswal D, Nasri-Heir C, Heir GM, Benoliel R. Sensory Changes Related to Dental Implant Placement: A Scoping Review. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2022;36(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.3027
AlDabeeb DS, Alakeel NS, Alkhalid TK. Endocrowns: indications, preparation techniques, and material selection. Cureus. 2023;15(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49947
Song D, Shujaat S, Politis C, Orhan K, Jacobs R. Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2022;49(5):573-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13296
Kubilius M, Kubilius R, Gleiznys A. The preservation of alveolar bone ridge during tooth extraction. Stomatologija. 2012;14(1):3-11.
Hench LL, Jones JR. Bioactive glasses: frontiers and challenges. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2015;3:194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00194
Armfield JM, Stewart JF, Spencer AJ. The vicious cycle of dental fear: exploring the interplay between oral health, service utilization and dental fear. BMC oral health. 2007;7:1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-7-1
Slavkin HC. Biomimicry, dental implants and clinical trials. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998;129(2):226-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0183
Grieznis L, Apse P, Blumfelds L. Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla. Stomatologija. 2010;12(3):80-86.
Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, Göz G. Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie. 2010;71(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-1023-7
Mahon N. Post-extraction inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbances: a guide to their evaluation and practical management. 2014.
Klineberg I, Trulsson M, Murray G. Occlusion on implants–is there a problem? Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2012;39(7):522-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02305.x
Navalesi P, Oddo CM, Chisci G, et al. The use of tactile sensors in oral and maxillofacial Surgery: An overview. Bioengineering. 2023;10(7):765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070765
Sandstedt P, Sörensen S. Neurosensory disturbances of the trigeminal nerve: a long-term follow-up of traumatic injuries. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1995;53(5):498-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90055-1
Alkhafaji AMA, Valizadeh S. Endocrown restorations on endodontically treated premolars teeth: A review. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2021;25(6):18606-18614.