Challenges and solutions in soft tissue grafting for receding gums

Authors

  • Maha Assad Munshi Department of Periodontics, Al Thager Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Rahaf Khaled Alkholaifi College of Dentistry, Alfarabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Wael Mohammed Hummadi College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • Talal Khalid AlGhamdi College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Seba Abdullah Almalki College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Sarah Mohammed Alqarni Dental Department, King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Ali Ayed Alkhmmash Dental Department, King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Amira Mohammed Aljared College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Talal Abdullah Almohaisen College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Reema Abdulaziz Alghamdi College of Dentistry, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
  • Abdulkarim Abdullah Alanazi Dental Department, Dr. Tooth Clinics, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250040

Keywords:

Soft tissue grafting, Periodontal therapy, Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine, Biomaterials

Abstract

Soft tissue grafting plays a critical role in addressing periodontal challenges, particularly in managing receding gums. It serves both functional and aesthetic purposes, offering solutions for root exposure, sensitivity, and compromised oral health. Advances in surgical techniques and material science have propelled the field forward, providing clinicians with diverse options to achieve optimal outcomes. Autologous grafts remain a standard for many cases, valued for their biocompatibility and success rates, though they present limitations such as donor site morbidity and limited availability. Innovative materials like nanofibrous scaffolds and hydrogels have revolutionized tissue engineering. These materials mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), promoting cell attachment and tissue integration while enabling the controlled delivery of bioactive agents. The emergence of 3D bioprinting has further enhanced precision, allowing for patient-specific graft designs that integrate vascular structures for improved survival. Decellularized matrices offer a biologically compatible alternative, preserving natural tissue architecture while reducing immune response risks. Patient-specific factors, including systemic health, genetic predispositions, and site-specific anatomy, significantly influence graft success. Advanced computational tools and predictive models now allow for personalized treatment strategies, addressing these variables effectively. Technologies such as bioreactors and imaging systems provide real-time insights into graft performance, bridging the gap between research and clinical application. Future directions focus on integrating cutting-edge biomaterials with regenerative medicine and computational modelling to develop smarter, more adaptive grafting solutions. As the field continues to evolve, the emphasis lies on achieving outcomes that balance functionality, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction while minimizing risks and complications. These advancements promise to reshape the landscape of periodontal therapy, offering innovative solutions for complex clinical challenges.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Levine RA, Huynh-Ba G, Cochran DL. Soft tissue augmentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29:155-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.2

Lazarov A. Soft-Tissue Augmentation in Periodontally Compromised Patients during Immediate Placement and Immediate Loading Dental Implant Surgery-A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofacial Surg. 2023;13(1):37-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_207_22

Caceres A, Coscia CC, Farrell ML. Optimizing a Gum Graft for Periodontal Surgery, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 2013.

Nwhator SO. Challenges of periodontal plastic surgery in a depressed economy: a report of two cases. Res Rep Trop Med. 2010:13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S12559

Ikada Y. Challenges in tissue engineering. J Royal Society Interface. 2006;3(10):589-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0124

Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:S123-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12185

Chen F-M, Zhang J, Zhang M, An Y, Chen F, Wu Z-F. A review on endogenous regenerative technology in periodontal regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2010;31(31):7892-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.019

Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, Hendrina S, Arielle R, Collet D, et al. Advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: innovation and transformation of medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018(1):2495848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2495848

Tabata Y. Biomaterial technology for tissue engineering applications. J Royal Society Interface. 2009;6(3):S311-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0448.focus

Sun W, Lal P. Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering-a review. Computer Methods Programs Biomed. 2002;67(2):85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00116-X

Sarkar N, Bhumiratana S, Geris L, Papantoniou I, Grayson WL. Bioreactors for engineering patient-specific tissue grafts. Nature Rev Bioengineering. 2023;1(5):361-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-023-00036-6

Bassetti M, Kaufmann R, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Bassetti R. Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: A review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(6):499-510.

Hodde J, Hiles M. Constructive soft tissue remodelling with a biologic extracellular matrix graft: overview and review of the clinical literature. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2007;107(6):641-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2007.11680139

Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167

Auricchio F, Conti M, Marconi S, Reali A, Tolenaar JL, Trimarchi S. Patient-specific aortic endografting simulation: from diagnosis to prediction. Computers Biol Med. 2013;43(4):386-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.01.006

Baker BM, Handorf AM, Ionescu LC, Li W-J, Mauck RL. New directions in nanofibrous scaffolds for soft tissue engineering and regeneration. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(5):515-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.09.39

Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthopaed Surg Res. 2014;9:1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-18

Mao AS, Mooney DJ. Regenerative medicine: Current therapies and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(47):14452-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508520112

Fisher MB, Mauck RL. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: recent innovations and the transition to translation. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2013;19(1):1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0723

Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Lam CXF, Tan KC, Lim TC. State of the art and future directions of scaffold‐based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Engineer Regenerat Med. 2007;1(4):245-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/term.24

Downloads

Published

2025-01-22

How to Cite

Assad Munshi, M., Alkholaifi, R. K., Hummadi, W. M., AlGhamdi, T. K., Almalki, S. A., Alqarni, S. M., Alkhmmash, A. A., Aljared, A. M., Almohaisen, T. A., Alghamdi, R. A., & Alanazi, A. A. (2025). Challenges and solutions in soft tissue grafting for receding gums. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 12(2), 999–1003. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250040

Issue

Section

Review Articles