Challenges and solutions in soft tissue grafting for receding gums
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20250040Keywords:
Soft tissue grafting, Periodontal therapy, Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine, BiomaterialsAbstract
Soft tissue grafting plays a critical role in addressing periodontal challenges, particularly in managing receding gums. It serves both functional and aesthetic purposes, offering solutions for root exposure, sensitivity, and compromised oral health. Advances in surgical techniques and material science have propelled the field forward, providing clinicians with diverse options to achieve optimal outcomes. Autologous grafts remain a standard for many cases, valued for their biocompatibility and success rates, though they present limitations such as donor site morbidity and limited availability. Innovative materials like nanofibrous scaffolds and hydrogels have revolutionized tissue engineering. These materials mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), promoting cell attachment and tissue integration while enabling the controlled delivery of bioactive agents. The emergence of 3D bioprinting has further enhanced precision, allowing for patient-specific graft designs that integrate vascular structures for improved survival. Decellularized matrices offer a biologically compatible alternative, preserving natural tissue architecture while reducing immune response risks. Patient-specific factors, including systemic health, genetic predispositions, and site-specific anatomy, significantly influence graft success. Advanced computational tools and predictive models now allow for personalized treatment strategies, addressing these variables effectively. Technologies such as bioreactors and imaging systems provide real-time insights into graft performance, bridging the gap between research and clinical application. Future directions focus on integrating cutting-edge biomaterials with regenerative medicine and computational modelling to develop smarter, more adaptive grafting solutions. As the field continues to evolve, the emphasis lies on achieving outcomes that balance functionality, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction while minimizing risks and complications. These advancements promise to reshape the landscape of periodontal therapy, offering innovative solutions for complex clinical challenges.
Metrics
References
Levine RA, Huynh-Ba G, Cochran DL. Soft tissue augmentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29:155-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.2
Lazarov A. Soft-Tissue Augmentation in Periodontally Compromised Patients during Immediate Placement and Immediate Loading Dental Implant Surgery-A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofacial Surg. 2023;13(1):37-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_207_22
Caceres A, Coscia CC, Farrell ML. Optimizing a Gum Graft for Periodontal Surgery, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 2013.
Nwhator SO. Challenges of periodontal plastic surgery in a depressed economy: a report of two cases. Res Rep Trop Med. 2010:13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S12559
Ikada Y. Challenges in tissue engineering. J Royal Society Interface. 2006;3(10):589-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0124
Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:S123-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12185
Chen F-M, Zhang J, Zhang M, An Y, Chen F, Wu Z-F. A review on endogenous regenerative technology in periodontal regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2010;31(31):7892-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.019
Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, Hendrina S, Arielle R, Collet D, et al. Advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: innovation and transformation of medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018(1):2495848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2495848
Tabata Y. Biomaterial technology for tissue engineering applications. J Royal Society Interface. 2009;6(3):S311-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0448.focus
Sun W, Lal P. Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering-a review. Computer Methods Programs Biomed. 2002;67(2):85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00116-X
Sarkar N, Bhumiratana S, Geris L, Papantoniou I, Grayson WL. Bioreactors for engineering patient-specific tissue grafts. Nature Rev Bioengineering. 2023;1(5):361-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-023-00036-6
Bassetti M, Kaufmann R, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Bassetti R. Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: A review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(6):499-510.
Hodde J, Hiles M. Constructive soft tissue remodelling with a biologic extracellular matrix graft: overview and review of the clinical literature. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2007;107(6):641-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2007.11680139
Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12167
Auricchio F, Conti M, Marconi S, Reali A, Tolenaar JL, Trimarchi S. Patient-specific aortic endografting simulation: from diagnosis to prediction. Computers Biol Med. 2013;43(4):386-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.01.006
Baker BM, Handorf AM, Ionescu LC, Li W-J, Mauck RL. New directions in nanofibrous scaffolds for soft tissue engineering and regeneration. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(5):515-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.09.39
Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthopaed Surg Res. 2014;9:1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-18
Mao AS, Mooney DJ. Regenerative medicine: Current therapies and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(47):14452-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508520112
Fisher MB, Mauck RL. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: recent innovations and the transition to translation. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2013;19(1):1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0723
Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Lam CXF, Tan KC, Lim TC. State of the art and future directions of scaffold‐based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Engineer Regenerat Med. 2007;1(4):245-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/term.24