Adherence to Indian public health standards 2022 standards: a cross-sectional study on infrastructure of health and wellness centres in Amritsar district of Punjab

Ramandeep Kaur; Sanjeev Mahajan; Preeti Padda; Kamal Jyoti

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20243783

Authors

Ramandeep Kaur Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Sanjeev Mahajan Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Preeti Padda Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Kamal Jyoti Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20243783

Keywords:

IPHS, R-PHC, UPHC, SHC, Infrastructure

Abstract

Background: After independence since 1952 basic healthcare services are primarily being delivered through primary health centres (PHCs). Recently, the government has expanded services with health and wellness centres (HWCs) to offer comprehensive primary care. Indian public health standards (IPHS) has formed the basis of their updation since 2007 with latest coming up in 2022. It is a general belief that infrastructure is lacking but no studies have been conducted to assess them in the border district of state of Punjab.

Methods: An observational cross‑sectional study was conducted among 8 urban PHCs (UPHCs), 17 rural PHCs (R-PHC) and 28 sub health centres (SHCs) of district Amritsar UPHCs selected by Simple random sampling whereas RPHCs and SHCs selected by two stages stratified random sampling) where available infrastructure was assessed using a checklist developed on basis of IPHS 2022. Data was collected by observation and interview with medical officer and community health officer. Based on the checklist, overall scores were calculated where presence/absence of infrastructure were scored as 1/0. The PHCs were then classified into very good (>80%), good (60-80%), average (40-60%), poor (<40%).

Results: Basic utilities like 24-hour electricity and water supply were available in 100% of R-PHCs, 89% of SHCs, and 100% of UPHCs. Fire safety measures were present in 50% of UPHCs, 35% of R-PHCs, and none of the SHCs. Residential facilities were available in 35% of R-PHCs, 4% of SHCs, and none of the UPHCs. Regarding clinical infrastructure, 70% of R-PHCs (24×7 and non 24×7) had inpatient wards, but none were equipped with minor OTs. In comparison, 62% of UPHCs (24×7 and non 24×7) had inpatient wards, and only 25% had minor OTs. Among SHCs, 89% had consultation. Overall, 83% of R-PHCs and 75% of UPHCs were graded very good or good, while 82% of SHCs were rated average or poor.

Conclusions: While basic amenities were widely available, significant gaps in clinical and support infrastructure were identified, particularly in SHCs, which lack fire safety measures, functional residential quarters, and dedicated health and wellness areas. These deficiencies underscore the need for targeted investments to enhance infrastructure across all HWC levels.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Curnow RN. World Health Organization. Statistical indicators for the planning and evaluation of public health programmes. Fourteenth report of the WHO expert committee on health statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 1972;135(2):287-8.

Goel S. From Bhore committee to national rural health mission: A critical review. Internet j health. 2008;7(1):1-4.

Government of India. Report of the Health Survey and Development Committee. Health Survey and Development Committee. Report number: IV, 1942. Available at: http://indianculture.gov.in/report-health-survey-and-development committee. Accessed on 13 March 2004.

Duggal R. Bhore Committee and its relevance today. Indian J Pediatr. 1991;58:395-406.

Government of India, MOHFW. Indian Public Health Standards Health and Wellness Centre-Sub health Centre. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2022. Volume-IV. 2022;120. Available at: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/SHC-HWC%20%26%20UHWC%20IPHS%202022%20Guidelines%20pdf.pdf. Accessed on 13 March 2004.

Government of India, MOHFW. Indian Public Health Standards Health and Wellness Centre- Primary Health Centre. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Volume-III. 2022;128. Available at: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/PHC%20IPHS_2022_Guideline_pdf.pdf. Accessed on 13 March 2004.

Government of India, MOHFW. Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2018l42. Available at: https://nhm.gov.in/New_Updates_2018/publication/Final_English_HWC_Booklet.pdf. Accessed on 13 March 2004.

Zaman FA, Laskar NB. An application of Indian public health standard for evaluation of primary health centres of an EAG and a Non-EAG state. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54(1):36-9.

Khatana GH, Khan SMS. A cross sectional study to identify the existing gaps in implementation Indian Public Health Standards in Primary Health Centres of South Kashmir. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(7):311-2.

Bashar MA, Goel S. Are our subcenters equipped enough to provide primary health care to the community: A study to explore the gaps in workforce and infrastructure in the subcenters from North India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6(2):208-10.

Kataria GM, Kaul RU. Assessment of available health services at subcentres as per Indian public health standards guidelines in a district of Jammu and Kashmir India: A cross sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12(7):1348-51.

Biswas D, Ojha V. Adhering to IPHS guidelines: a study of health facility in Shiekhpura district of Bihar. Centre for Health and Social Justice. 2012. Available at: bvha_-_brief_29-10 12.pdf (chsj.org). Accessed on 15 September 2024.

Chauhan R, Mazta S, Dhadwal D, Sandhu S. Indian public health standards in primary health centers and community health centers in Shimla District of Himachal Pradesh: A descriptive evaluation. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2016;3(1):22-7.

Goswami P, Chakraborty A, Das DK, Ray S. Gap analysis in workforce and infrastructure in the subcenters for upgradation to health and wellness center in a community development block of Purba Bardhaman district, West Bengal. Indian J Community Med. 2021;46:300-3.

Bayapa Reddy N, Ravi Prabhu G, Sai TSR. Study on the Availability of Physical Infrastructure and Manpower Facilities in Sub-centers of Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J of Public Health. 2012;56(4):290-2.

Patil SK, Shivaswamy MS. Assessment of sub-centres of Belagavi district according to Indian public health standards 2012 guidelines: a cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4:1938-42.

Government of India, MOHFW. Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness centres assessment in 18 states. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2024;56. Available at: //nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/AB HWC%20Report%20-%20FINAL%20-%20May%2013.pdf. Accessed on 15 September 2024.