Long-term success of inlay and onlay procedures in dental repairs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20242688Keywords:
Inlays, Onlays, Dental restorations, Long-term success, Bonding techniquesAbstract
Inlays and onlays are vital restorative techniques in dentistry, offering a conservative alternative to full crowns while preserving more of the natural tooth structure. These restorations, typically made from ceramic or composite resin materials, provide both aesthetic and functional benefits and are increasingly favored for their durability and longevity. In contrast to direct restorations, inlays and onlays are fabricated outside the mouth, allowing for greater precision and a more customized fit. The clinical success of these restorations largely depends on factors such as material choice, bonding technique, and patient-related variables like oral hygiene and habits. Ceramic materials are particularly noted for their resistance to wear and their ability to closely mimic the natural appearance of teeth, making them an attractive option for both patients and clinicians. Composite resins, while slightly less durable, offer a cost-effective alternative with satisfactory long-term results. Proper bonding techniques and high-quality materials are essential for ensuring the durability of inlays and onlays, with many restorations lasting over a decade. Patient-related factors also play a significant role in the success of inlays and onlays. Effective oral hygiene, regular dental check-ups, and the avoidance of habits like bruxism are essential for maintaining the integrity of these restorations over time. Despite the challenges and technical demands associated with their placement, inlays and onlays are highly successful when properly executed, offering patients a durable, aesthetically pleasing solution for dental repairs. The discussion of this review focuses on the critical elements that influence the long-term success of inlays and onlays, including material selection, clinical technique, and patient management, highlighting their effectiveness as a restorative option in modern dentistry.
Metrics
References
De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J. An 18-year retrospective survival study of full crowns with or without posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(2).
Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II--Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(1).
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry-University of Washington. 2004;29:481-508.
Christensen GJ. The advantages of minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(11):1563-5.
Guess PC, Schultheis S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2013;110(4):264-73.
Van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel‐bonded ceramic coverage. A 5‐year follow‐up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109(4):222-9.
van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin–enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dental Materials. 2010;26(9):929-39.
Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3(1).
De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82(2):136-40.
Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87(5):503-9.
Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dental Materials. 2004;20(5):449-56.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dental Materials. 2011;27(1):17-28.