Implementing safety standards in radiographic practices: challenges and solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20242577Keywords:
Radiographic safety, Ionizing radiation, Regulatory compliance, Technological advancements, Safety cultureAbstract
Ensuring the safety of patients and healthcare workers in radiographic practices is a critical concern in modern healthcare. The use of ionizing radiation, while invaluable for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, carries inherent risks that necessitate stringent safety standards. Despite advances in technology and regulatory frameworks, the consistent implementation of these safety standards remains a challenge across various healthcare settings. The discussion addresses the complexities of navigating diverse regulatory environments, where enforcement and adherence to safety guidelines can vary significantly. These inconsistencies are particularly pronounced in low-resource regions, where limited access to modern radiographic equipment and inadequate training further exacerbate the risks of radiation exposure. Technological advancements in radiography, such as digital radiography, dose-reduction software, and advanced imaging modalities, offer significant benefits in terms of diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, they also introduce new challenges in maintaining up-to-date safety protocols. The rapid pace of innovation often outstrips the ability of regulatory bodies to update guidelines, leading to gaps in safety practices. Additionally, the effectiveness of these technologies depends heavily on proper usage and understanding by radiographic professionals, highlighting the need for continuous education and training. A strong safety culture within radiographic practices is essential for minimizing radiation risks. Leadership commitment, ongoing education, effective communication, and the empowerment of radiographic professionals are critical components of this culture. When these elements are in place, they foster an environment where safety is prioritized, and all staff members are actively engaged in maintaining and improving safety standards. The multifaceted approach required to enhance radiographic safety underscores the importance of harmonizing regulatory efforts, investing in modern technologies, and cultivating a safety-first mindset among healthcare professionals. These efforts collectively contribute to the safe and effective use of radiographic technology, ultimately protecting both patients and healthcare workers from unnecessary radiation exposure.
Metrics
References
Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. Vol 6. Philadelphia. 2006.
Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Vol 37, Elsevier Oxford. 2007.
Bushberg JT, Seibert J, Leidholdt E, Boone J. The essential physics of medical imaging 3rd ed. In: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA. 2012.
WHO. Communicating radiation risks in paediatric imaging: information to support health care discussions about benefit and risk. 2016.
Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Donald PF, Eric JH, Roger WH, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011;258(3):889-905.
Applegate K. Image Gently: A campaign to promote radiation protection for children worldwide. SA J Radiol. 2015;19(2):1-5.
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Choonsik L, Heather SF, Michael F, et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400-9.
Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, Stephen B, Robert D, Renato P, et al. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Interventional Radiol. 2010;33:230-9.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Eng J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-84.
Krohmer JS. Radiography and fluoroscopy, 1920 to the present. Radiographics. 1989;9(6):1129-53.
Kalender WA. Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phy Med Biol. 2014;59(3):R129.
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology. 2017;284(1):120-33.
Zacharias C, Alessio AM, Otto RK, Ramesh SI, Grace SP, Jonathan OS, et al. Pediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):950-6.
Murray JS, Clifford J, Larson S, Lee JK, Sculli GL. Implementing just culture to improve patient safety. Military Med. 2023;188(7-8):1596-9.
Rehani M, Frush D. Tracking radiation exposure of patients. The Lancet. 2010;376(9743):754-5.