Strategies for minimizing repeated exposures in diagnostic radiography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20242300Keywords:
Radiographic exposure, Dose reduction, Digital radiography, Patient education, Radiation safetyAbstract
Advancements in diagnostic radiography have significantly improved medical imaging, yet the associated radiation exposure poses health risks, particularly with repeated examinations. Technological innovations, including the transition from analog to digital radiography, have led to substantial reductions in radiation doses while enhancing image quality. Digital systems, coupled with automatic exposure control (AEC), dynamically adjust radiation levels based on patient size and diagnostic requirements, minimizing unnecessary exposure. Iterative reconstruction algorithms in CT imaging further reduce radiation doses by efficiently processing images and reducing noise. Hardware improvements, such as high-efficiency detectors, capture high-quality images with lower radiation levels, contributing to dose reduction. Standardizing radiographic protocols across healthcare settings ensures consistent practices, reducing variability in radiation doses. Techniques such as beam collimation and appropriate shielding protect surrounding tissues and enhance image quality, while continuous education for technologists maintains proficiency in dose-reduction strategies. Patient education is crucial for minimizing repeated exposures. Informing patients about the risks of ionizing radiation and the importance of adhering to follow-up schedules can reduce unnecessary examinations. Electronic health records (EHRs) facilitate the tracking of cumulative radiation doses, enabling informed decision-making regarding additional imaging studies. Adherence to the ALARA principle (As low as reasonably achievable) in clinical practice ensures that radiation exposure is minimized while achieving diagnostic goals. Special considerations for vulnerable populations, such as children and pregnant women, further enhance safety. Implementing radiation safety measures and maintaining a commitment to ongoing professional development for healthcare providers fosters a culture of safety within radiology departments. By integrating these strategies, healthcare providers can balance the diagnostic benefits of radiography with the imperative to protect patients from unnecessary radiation exposure, ultimately enhancing patient safety and improving diagnostic outcomes. This comprehensive approach ensures that radiographic procedures remain both effective and safe, optimizing patient care in medical imaging.
Metrics
References
Hall E, Brenner D. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Brit J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362-78.
Seibert JA. Digital radiography: the bottom line comparison of CR and DR technology. Appl Radiol. 2009;38(5):21-9.
Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Medical imaging physics. John Wiley and Sons. 2003.
Fitousi N. Patient dose monitoring systems: a new way of managing patient dose and quality in the radiology department. Physica Medica. 2017;44:212- 21.
Bick U, Lenzen H. PACS: the silent revolution. European Radiol. 1999;9:1152-60.
McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT: radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002;22(6):1541-53.
Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL. Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology. 2003;228(2):352-60.
Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics. 2004;24(6):1747-60.
Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):191-9.
Martin C. Optimisation in general radiography. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;3:e18.
Seibert JA, Boone JM. X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 2: X-ray interactions and image formation. J Nuclear Med Technol. 2005;33(1):3-18.
Seibert JA. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Health Physics. 2008;95(5):586-98.
Quinn A, Taylor C, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T. Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Brit J Radiol. 1997;70(829):102-6.
Rehani M, Frush D. Tracking radiation exposure of patients. The Lancet. 2010;376(9743):754-5.
Protection ICoR. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Vol 1: International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1977.