Microbial challenges and solutions in root canal therapy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20242271Keywords:
RCT, Microbial invasion, Biofilm formation, Antimicrobial strategies, Endodontic disinfectionAbstract
Root canal therapy (RCT) faces significant challenges due to microbial invasion and biofilm formation within the root canal system. The intricate anatomy of root canals, including isthmuses, lateral canals, and apical deltas, provides a conducive environment for pathogenic microorganisms, complicating effective disinfection. Key pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans are highly resilient, capable of forming biofilms that protect them from antimicrobial agents and host defences. Current antimicrobial strategies in endodontics combine mechanical instrumentation with chemical disinfection. Mechanical debridement, though essential, often falls short of thoroughly cleaning the complex root canal anatomy. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), the gold standard irrigant, exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties but struggles to penetrate biofilms and dentinal tubules fully. Adjunctive solutions like chlorhexidine (CHX) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) enhance the antimicrobial efficacy of NaOCl by providing prolonged action and removing the smear layer, respectively. Intracanal medicaments, such as calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), are utilized to maintain antimicrobial activity between treatment sessions. Despite its high pH and effectiveness against a wide range of bacteria, Ca(OH)2 shows limited efficacy against biofilm-forming bacteria like Enterococcus faecalis. Innovations in irrigation techniques, such as passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and laser-activated irrigation (LAI), have improved the delivery and activation of irrigants, enhancing their ability to disrupt biofilms and penetrate the root canal system. Nanoparticle-based irrigants and medicaments represent a promising advancement in endodontic disinfection. Their small size and large surface area allow for better penetration and interaction with bacterial cells, significantly reducing bacterial load in the root canal system. Combining traditional and advanced antimicrobial strategies is essential for overcoming the limitations of current methods and improving the success rates of endodontic therapy. Understanding the mechanisms of microbial invasion and biofilm formation, along with integrating emerging technologies, can lead to more effective disinfection protocols. This approach aims to enhance treatment outcomes and ultimately ensure the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.
Metrics
References
Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endodont. 2008;34(11):1291-301.
Nair PR. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(6):348-81.
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1998;85(1):86-93.
Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endodont. 2010;36(8):1277-88.
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dental Clin. 2010;54(2):291-312.
Alfirdous RA, Garcia IM, Balhaddad AA, Collares FM, Martinho FC, Melo MAS. Advancing photodynamic therapy for endodontic disinfection with nanoparticles: present evidence and upcoming approaches. Applied Sci. 2021;11(11):4759.
Kakehashi S, Stanley H, Fitzgerald R. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965;20(3):340-9.
Siqueira Jr J, Rôças I. Diversity of endodontic microbiota revisited. J Dental Res. 2009;88(11):969-81.
Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF, Bate AL, Ford TRP. Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endodont. 2009;35(4):493-502.
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endodont. 2006;32(5):389-98.
Evans MD, Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul S-u, Xia T. Efficacy of calcium hydroxide: chlorhexidine paste as an intracanal medication in bovine dentin. J Endodont. 2003;29(5):338-9.
Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dental Res. 2000;79(6):1405-9.
Haapasalo M, Qian W, Portenier I, Waltimo T. Effects of dentin on the antimicrobial properties of endodontic medicaments. J Endodont. 2007;33(8):917-25.
Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endodont. 2000;26(6):331-4.
Gu L-s, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endodont. 2009;35(6):791-804.
Ahmetoglu F, Keles A, Yalcin M, Simsek N. Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study. Eur J Dentistr. 2014;8(01):53-7.
Jandt KD, Watts DC. Nanotechnology in dentistry: Present and future perspectives on dental nanomaterials. Dental Materials. 2020;36(11):1365-78.