Dentofacial deformities and their management in prosthodontic practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20242189Keywords:
CAD/CAM technology , Dentofacial deformities, High-strength ceramics vaccine, Orthognathic surgery, ProsthodonticsAbstract
Dentofacial deformities encompass a wide range of skeletal and dental discrepancies that can significantly impact a patient's oral function, aesthetics, and overall quality of life. These deformities can arise from congenital, developmental, or acquired factors, each contributing to the complexity of diagnosis and treatment. Congenital conditions, such as cleft lip and palate and genetic syndromes, often result in significant craniofacial anomalies. Developmental disturbances, including hormonal imbalances and nutritional deficiencies, can further exacerbate these conditions. Additionally, trauma, infections, and neoplasms play a critical role in the etiology of acquired dentofacial deformities. Effective management of dentofacial deformities in prosthodontics requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating orthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and advanced prosthodontic techniques. Diagnostic advancements, including 3D imaging and digital workflows, facilitate precise planning and customization of prosthetic solutions. Orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery are pivotal in correcting skeletal discrepancies and establishing a stable foundation for prosthodontic rehabilitation. Post-surgical prosthodontic interventions involve the use of high-strength ceramics, zirconia, and biocompatible implant materials to restore dental function and aesthetics. Technological advancements have revolutionized prosthodontic practice. computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology allows for the accurate design and fabrication of prosthetic components, enhancing treatment predictability and efficiency. The development of minimally invasive techniques, such as guided implant surgery and laser applications, has reduced procedural invasiveness and improved patient outcomes. The integration of digital tools and advanced materials has significantly enhanced the precision, durability, and aesthetic quality of prosthetic restorations. Overall, the advances in prosthodontic techniques and materials have greatly improved the management of dentofacial deformities, offering patients better functional and aesthetic results. Continued innovation and research are essential to address the complex challenges associated with these deformities, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes in prosthodontic practice.
Metrics
References
Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DM. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. Mosby St. Louis. 2003;283.
Dixon AD, Hoyte DA, Ronning O. Fundamentals of craniofacial growth. Crc Press. 2017.
McNamara JA, Brudon WL. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition. 1993.
Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. JP Medical Ltd. 2015.
Eckert SE, Laney WR. Patient evaluation and prosthodontic treatment planning for osseointegrated implants. Dental Clinics of North America. 1989;33(4):599-618.
Chew MT, Sandham A, Soh J, Wong HB. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients: a subjective and objective evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(5):845-50.
Kutcipal E. Pediatric oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dental Clinics. 2013;57(1):83-98.
Proffit WR, Fields Jr H, Moray L. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97-106.
Braun TL, Xue AS, Maricevich RS. Differences in the management of pediatric facial trauma. Paper presented at: Seminars in plastic surgery. 2017.
Da Silva Salomão GV, Chun EP, Panegaci RdS, Santos FT. Analysis of digital workflow in implantology. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2021;2021(1):6655908.
Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevenson M. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study. AJODO. 2006;130(3):300-9.
Bell WH, Dann III JJ. Correction of dentofacial deformities by surgery in the anterior part of the jaws: a study of stability and soft-tissue changes. Am J Orthod. 1973;64(2):162-87.
Rekow D, Thompson VP. Engineering long term clinical success of advanced ceramic prostheses. JMS: Materials in Medicine. 2007;18:47-56.
Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontology. 2017;73(1):178-92.
Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. JPR. 2004;92(6):557-62.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. JPR. 2004;17(5).
Pilenza D, Filippi A, Walter C, Zitzmann NU, Bornstein MM, Kühl S. Surgical therapy of peri-implantitis with adjunctive hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative: A 1-year retrospective case series. J Clin Dent. 2022;132(4):238-46.