Biomechanical innovations in correcting severe malocclusions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20241988Keywords:
Orthodontics, Malocclusion, Biomechanical, Temporary anchorage devicesAbstract
The correction of severe malocclusions presents significant challenges in orthodontics due to the complexity and precision required for effective treatment. Recent biomechanical innovations have transformed the landscape of orthodontic care, offering more precise, efficient, and patient-friendly solutions. Advancements in orthodontic bracket systems, including the development of self-ligating brackets and heat-activated arch wires, have enhanced the control and comfort of tooth movements, reduced treatment times and improving patient outcomes. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have provided stable anchorage points, enabling complex tooth movements that were previously difficult to achieve. TADs have proven particularly effective in managing open bites and class II malocclusions, offering non-surgical alternatives for severe cases. The integration of digital technology in orthodontics, such as 3D imaging and computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM), has further revolutionized treatment planning and execution. These technologies facilitate accurate diagnostics and the creation of customized orthodontic appliances, ensuring precise and predictable treatment outcomes. Clear aligner therapy, initially limited to simple cases, has advanced through the use of improved thermoplastic materials and digital customization, allowing for the treatment of more complex malocclusions. Innovative force application techniques, including the use of attachments and elastics, have expanded the capabilities of aligners, making them a versatile and effective alternative to traditional braces. Collectively, these biomechanical innovations have significantly improved the management of severe malocclusions, enhancing treatment efficiency, precision, and patient comfort. The ongoing development of these technologies promises to further advance the field of orthodontics, providing more effective and aesthetically pleasing solutions for patients with complex dental alignment issues.
Metrics
References
Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Optimizing anterior and canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976;70(1):1-19.
Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(5):604.
Boyd RL, Miller RJ, Vlaskalic V. The Invisalign system in adult orthodontics: mild crowding and space closure cases. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34(4):203-12.
Hanley KJ. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. New York State Dental J. 2005;71(6):69.
Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthoped. 2007;132(2):216-22.
Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan H-L, Padial-Molina M, Wang H-L. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures. Implant Dentistr. 2014;23(2):155-61.
Damon D. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self‐ligating bracket. Clin Orthodont Res. 1998;1(1):52-61.
Parvizi F, Rock W. The load/deflection characteristics of thermally activated orthodontic archwires. Euro J Orthod. 2003;25(4):417-21.
Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield Jr JK, Eckert GJ, Snyder RJ. Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(3):383-8.
Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2007;103(5):e6-15.
Sherwood KH, Burch J, Thompson W. Intrusion of supererupted molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. Angle Orthodontist. 2003;73(5):597-601.
Carano A, Velo S, Incorvati C, Poggio P. Clinical applications of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (MAS) in the maxillary alveolar bone. Progress Orthodont. 2004;5(2):212-35.
Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. J Am Dental Assoc. 2005;136(12):1724-9.
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthodonti Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):27-35.
Hansa I, Katyal V, Ferguson DJ, Vaid N. Outcomes of clear aligner treatment with and without dental monitoring: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(4):453-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
