Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20240018Keywords:
Orthodontic bracket bonding, Adhesion failures, Direct bonding, Indirect bondingAbstract
The introduction of glass ionomer cements in orthodontics aimed to address the drawbacks of the acid-etch technique using composite resins, including demineralization, enamel damage, and potential allergic reactions. These cements release fluoride over time, potentially protecting against demineralization. Glass ionomer cements, despite their benefits in reducing adhesive residue and protecting against demineralization, showed higher bond failure rates compared to composite resins. This is attributed to their sensitivity to application techniques and moisture, along with a delayed setting time. In contrast, light-cured composite resins, preferred over chemically-cured resins in recent years, offer advantages such as ease of use, consistent handling, and controlled setting. However, early trials indicated higher bond failure rates for light-cured resins, a finding not consistently replicated in later studies. While glass ionomer cements offer certain advantages, their higher bond failure rate poses a significant limitation. Light-cured composite resins, with their user-friendly characteristics, have become the preferred choice in orthodontic bonding despite initial concerns about higher bond failure rates.
Metrics
References
Brown MW, Koroluk L, Ko CC, Zhang K, Chen M, Nguyen T. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(6):1067-74.
Santos AL, Wambier LM, Wambier DS, Moreira KM, Imparato JC, Chibinski AC. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(9):746-55.
Roelofs T, Merkens N, Roelofs J, Bronkhorst E, Breuning H. A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failures. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(1):111-7.
Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(5):615-22.
Gange P. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147(4):S56-63.
Kim J, Chun YS, Kim M. Accuracy of bracket positions with a CAD/CAM indirect bonding system in posterior teeth with different cusp heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(2):298-307.
Nojima LI, Araújo AS, Alves Júnior M. Indirect orthodontic bonding--a modified technique for improved efficiency and precision. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(3):109-17.
Oliveira NS, Gribel BF, Neves LS, Lages EMB, Macari S, Pretti H. Comparison of the accuracy of virtual and direct bonding of orthodontic accessories. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(4):46-53.
Huang XH, Xu L, Lin S. Effects of double transparent pressure diaphragm transfer tray on indirect bonding. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016;25(6):734-7.
Vijayakumar RK, Jagadeep R, Ahamed F, Kanna A, Suresh K. How and why of orthodontic bond failures: An in vivo study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6(1):S85-9.
Papageorgiou SN, Pandis N. Clinical evidence on orthodontic bond failure and associated factors. In: Eliades T, Brantley WA, eds. Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials. Woodhead Publishing; 2017: 191-206.
Chatzistavrou E, Eliades T, Zinelis S, Athanasiou AE, Eliades G. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4):458.
Miller JR, Mancl L, Arbuckle G, Baldwin J, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(4):309-12.
Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(4):373-84.
Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(5):547-50.
Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998;25(4):283-7.
Artun J. A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(2):219-28.
Fleming PS, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(4):S92-103.
Koupis NS, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(5):922-5.
Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(3):277-81.
Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2000;27(2):143-8.
Choo SC, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenote) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(4):403-9.
Hamilton R, Goonewardene MS, Murray K. Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24(2):102-9.
House K, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. An investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod. 2006;33(1):38-44.
Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod. 2003;30(2):139-47.
Ponduri S, Turnbull N, Birnie D, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. Does atropine sulphate improve orthodontic bond survival? A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 132(5):663-70.
Barry GR. A clinical investigation of the effects of omission of pumice prophylaxis on band and bond failure. Br J Orthod. 1995;22(3):245-8.
Lindauer SJ, Browning H, Shroff B, Marshall F, Anderson RH, Moon PC. Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(6):599-605.
Burgess AM, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(1):114-8.
Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(3):423-6.
Talic NF. Effect of fluoridated paste on the failure rate of precoated brackets bonded with self-etching primer: a prospective split-mouth study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(4):527-30.
Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42(11):625-40.
Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(1):83-94.
Nandhra SS, Littlewood SJ, Houghton N, Luther F, Prabhu J, Munyombwe T, et al. Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(2):147-55.
Eliades T. Do we need a randomized controlled trial to assess trivial, albeit standard used, clinical steps in bonding? The answer is yes, but there are some interpretation issues. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(2):156-7.
Varlik SK, Demirbaş E. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on the bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 135(2):144.
El-Angbawi AM. Is the 0.018-inch or the 0.022-inch bracket slot system more effective for the levelling and alignment stage of orthodontic treatment?. University Dundee. 2013.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Melsen B, Scribante A. A 12 month clinical study of bond failures of recycled versus new stainless steel orthodontic brackets. The Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(4):449-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
