Feasibility of tele-rehabilitation in low resource setting: perceived barriers and facilitators among physiotherapy professionals

Anulucia Augustine; Priyadarshani Katalkar; Divya Kokal

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20240625

Authors

Anulucia Augustine Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiotherapy, MGM COP, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Priyadarshani Katalkar Department of Neurophysiotherapy, MGM COP, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Divya Kokal MGM College of Physiotherapy, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20240625

Keywords:

Challenges, Enablers, Low-resource settings, Physical therapy, Telehealth

Abstract

Background: Robust evidence illustrates the significance and efficacy of telerehabilitation to optimize the participation in rehabilitation program taking into account organisational, geographical and transportation aspects. Despite knowing the remarkable benefits, there exist an array of challenges to implement telerehabilitation services in a setting with meagre resources. In order to augment the uptake of telerehabilitation services, our study aims to explore the perceived barriers and facilitators to telerehabilitation among Physiotherapy professional in a resource limited setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among physiotherapy professionals in Maharashtra using a questionnaire with a content validation index of 0.95. The survey sought to ascertain the awareness, barriers, facilitators and strategies to improve practice of telerehabilitation.

Results: A total of 450 Physiotherapists were invited, of which, 201 participated in the study. The major barriers to telerehabilitation were inaccuracy in obtaining adequate information (n=149, 74%), lack of face-to-face monitoring (n=131, 65%) and physical limitation in older adults (n=114, 57%); on the other hand, the facilitators were reduced transportation time to hospital/clinic (n=132, 67%) and improved accessibility to healthcare services (n=125, 62%). The factors that enabled the patients to participate were flexible appointment schedule (n=139, 69%) and minimal transportation costs (n=129, 64%). Furthermore, the participants majorly considered encouraging patients’ appropriate environment, insurance coverage, training and upskilling of clinicians as the strategies to improve practice.

Conclusions: The implementation of telerehabilitation program has been limited due to perceived constraints associated with various organizational, geographical and patient factors. However, physiotherapists reported strategies to improve practices could be implemented to accelerate the utilization of telerehabilitation services.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rabanifar N, Abdi K. Barriers and challenges of implementing telerehabilitation: a systematic review. Iran Rehabilit J. 2021;19(2):121-8.

Laver KE, Adey‐Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin NA, George S, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochr Datab System Revi. 2020;(1).

Donner CF, Raskin J, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Ambrosino N, Balbi B, et al. Incorporating telemedicine into the integrated care of the COPD patient a summary of an interdisciplinary workshop held in Stresa, Italy, 7–8 September 2017. Respirat Medi. 2018;143:91-102.

Bittner AK, Yoshinaga PD, Wykstra SL, Li T. Telerehabilitation for people with low vision. Cochr Datab System Revi. 2020;(2).

Bianchini E, Onelli C, Morabito C, Alborghetti M, Rinaldi D, Anibaldi P, et al. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of telerehabilitation in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. Fronti neurol. 2022;13:1100.

Cox NS, Dal Corso S, Hansen H, McDonald CF, Hill CJ, Zanaboni P, et al. Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochr Datab System Revi. 2021;(1).

Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabilit. 2017;31(5):625-38.

Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O’Leary SP, Raymer ME, Russell TG. Service provider perceptions of telerehabilitation as an additional service delivery option within an Australian neurosurgical and orthopaedic physiotherapy screening clinic: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:7-16.

Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O’Leary SP, Raymer ME, Russell TG. Clinicians’ perspectives of a novel home-based multidisciplinary telehealth service for patients with chronic spinal pain. Int J Telerehabil. 2018;10(2):81.

Howard IM, Kaufman MS. Telehealth applications for outpatients with neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58:475-85.

Mohamad IS, Defi IR. Telerehabilitation in Low-and Middle-income Countries. In: Telehealth/Telemedicine–The Far-Reaching Medicine for Everyone and Everywhere; 2022.

Gilbert GE, Prion S. Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe's content validity index. Clin Simul Nursing. 2016;12(12):530-1.

Soni KM, Khatri SM. Use of Tele-physiotherapy as a treatment tool by physiotherapists in North Gujarat: A Survey. IOSR-JDM. 2020;19(4):21-5.

Narekuli A, Raja K, Pandve HT. Telerehabilitation in India: Points to Ponder. IJPOT. 2019;13(3):18.

Aloyuni S, Alharbi R, Kashoo F, Alqahtani M, Alanazi A, Alzhrani M, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and barriers to telerehabilitation-based physical therapy practice in Saudi Arabia. InHealth. 2020;8(4):460.

Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Informat Deci Mak. 2021;21(1):1-2.

Akulwar-Tajane I, Bhatt GD. Telerehabilitation: an alternative service delivery model for pediatric neurorehabilitation services at a tertiary care Center in India. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;9:595.

CE M, TA B, CT S, Fatoye C, Maikudi L, Fatoye F. Awareness, attitude and expectations of physiotherapy students on telerehabilitation. Medi Sci Educat. 2021;31:627-36.

Odole AC, Ojo OD. Is telephysiotherapy an option for improved quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee?. Int J Telemedi Applicat. 2014;2014.