Applications, benefits, and limitations of fiber-reinforced composites in fixed prosthodontics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233495Keywords:
Efficacy, Benefits, Limitations, Fiber-reinforced compositesAbstract
This study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy, benefits, and limitations of fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) in fixed prosthodontics. Emerging as a substitute for conventional dental materials such as metals and ceramics, FRCs are now used in a variety of applications, from dental crowns and bridges to veneers. The study is based on an exhaustive literature review and explores various properties of FRCs, such as mechanical, optical, viscoelastic, adhesive, and thermal attributes. The strength and rigidity of constructions made from FRC are dependent on the polymer matrix of the FRC and the type of fiber reinforcement. In dental appliances of relatively small sizes, the quality of the load bearing FRC sub-structure is very important. A special emphasis is placed on the clinical applications and future potential of these materials. The advantages of using FRCs include their biocompatibility, light weight, durability, and aesthetic superiority. However, there are limitations, such as higher costs and concerns about long-term clinical performance, specifically related to interface degradation. The study concludes that FRCs hold significant promise in the domain of fixed prosthodontics, although further research is needed for optimizing their long-term effectiveness.
References
Vallittu P, Özcan M. Clinical guide to principles of fiber-reinforced composites in dentistry. Woodhead Publishing. 2017.
Smith D. Recent developments and prospects in dental polymers. J Prosth Dentistry. 1962;12(6):1066-78.
Murphy J. The reinforced plastics handbook. Elsevier. 1998.
Rosen MR. From Treating Solution to Filler Surface and Beyond: The Life History of a Silane. Coupling Agent. J Coatings Technol. 1978;50;70-82.
Matinlinna J, Areva S, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Characterization of siloxane films on titanium substrate derived from three aminosilanes. Surface Interface Analysis. 2004;36(9):1314-22.
Vallittu P. Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibres and acrylic denture base material. J Oral Rehab. 1993;20(5):533-9.
Norström A, Watson H, Engström B, Rosenholm J. Treatment of E-glass fibres with acid, base and silanes. Colloids Surfaces Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2001;194(1-3):143-57.
Vallittu PK. Fibre-reinforced composites (FRCs) as dental materials. In: Non-Metallic Biomaterials for Tooth Repair and Replacement. 2012;352-74.
Özcan M, Van Der Sleen JM, Kurunmäki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic‐fused‐to‐metal crowns. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(5):283-8.
Vallittu P. Use of woven glass fibres to reinforce a composite veneer. A fracture resistance and acoustic emission study. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29(5):423-9.
Safwat EM, Khater AGA, Abd-Elsatar AG, Khater GA. Glass fiber-reinforced composites in dentistry. Bull Nat Res Centre. 2021;45(1):190.
Debnath S, Ranade R, Wunder S, McCool J, Boberick K, Baran G. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites. Dent Mat. 2004;20(7):677-86.
Tuusa SR, Peltola M, Tirri T, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Frontal bone defect repair with experimental glass‐fiber‐reinforced composite with bioactive glass granule coating. J Biomed Mat Res Part B: Appl Biomat. 2007;82(1):149-55.
Khan AS, Azam MT, Khan M, Mian SA, Rehman IU. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composites: a systematic review. Mat Sci Eng. 2015;47:26-39.
Behl S, Rajan G, Ellakwa A, Farrar P, Prusty BG. Physical and mechanical characterisation of flowable dental composites reinforced with short aspect ratio micro-sized S-Glass fibres. Mat Sci Eng. 2020;111:110771.
Khan AS, Phillips MJ, Tanner KE, Wong FS. Comparison of the visco-elastic behavior of a pre-impregnated reinforced glass fiber composite with resin-based composite. Dent Materials. 2008;24(11):1534-8.
Le Bell A-M, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dentistry. 2005;33(7):533-9.
Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LV. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Materials. 2008;24(2):211-5.
Vallittu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: a clinical study. J Prosth Dentistry. 2000;84(4):413-8.
Kumbuloglu O, Özcan M. Fracture strength of direct surface-retained fixed partial dentures: effect of fiber reinforcement versus the use of particulate filler composites only. Dent Materials J. 2008;27(2):195-202.
Polacek P, Pavelka V, Ozcan M. Effect of intermediate adhesive resin and flowable resin application on the interfacial adhesion of resin composite to pre-impregnated unidirectional S2-glass fiber bundles. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(2):155-9.
Narva KK, Vallittu PK, Helenius H, Yli-Urpo A. Clinical survey of acrylic resin removable denture repairs with glass-fiber reinforcement. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(3).
Perea L, Matinlinna JP, Tolvanen M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses with various pontics. J Adhesive Dentistry. 2014;16(2).
Perea L, Matinlinna JP, Tolvanen M, Mannocci F, Watson TF, Vallittu PK. Penetration depth of monomer systems into acrylic resin denture teeth used as pontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(5):480-7.
Petersen R, Liu P-R. 3D-woven fiber-reinforced composite for CAD/CAM dental application. SAMPE J Soc Advancement Material Process Eng. 2016;2016.
Vallittu PK. A Review of Fiber-Reinforced Denture Base Resins. J Prosthodont. 1996;5(4):270-6.
Ballo A, Vallittu P. Alternative fabrication method for chairside fiber-reinforced composite resin provisional fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(5).
Strassler HE, Serio CL. Esthetic considerations when splinting with fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):507-24.
Zenthöfer A, Rammelsberg P, Schmitt C, Ohlmann B. Wear of metal-free resin composite crowns after three years in service. Dent Materials J. 2013;32(5):787-92.
Frese C, Decker C, Rebholz J, Stucke K, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Original and repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composites in vitro. Dent Materials. 2014;30(4):456-62.
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Carvalho RM, Hirata R, Lubelski W, Bonfante G, et al. Digitally produced fiber-reinforced composite substructures for three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(2):321-9.
Posti JP, Piitulainen JM, Hupa L, Fagerlund S, Frantzén J, Aitasalo KMJ, et al. A glass fiber-reinforced composite - bioactive glass cranioplasty implant: A case study of an early development stage implant removed due to a late infection. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;55:191-200.
Sfondrini MF, Fraticelli D, Castellazzi L, Scribante A, Gandini P. Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survival between mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of flexible spiral wire and fiber-reinforced composite. J Clin Exp Dentistry. 2014;6(2):e145.
Sfondrini MF, Massironi S, Pieraccini G, Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV, et al. Flexural strengths of conventional and nanofilled fiber-reinforced composites: a three-point bending test. Dent Traumatol. 2014;30(1):32-5.
Gogna R, Jagadis S, Shashikal K. A comparative in vitro study of microleakage by a radioactive isotope and compressive strength of three nanofilled composite resin restorations. J Conservative Dentistry. 2011;14(2):128.
Scribante A, Massironi S, Pieraccini G, Vallittu P, Lassila L, Sfondrini MF, et al. Effects of nanofillers on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized with light-curing and additional postcuring. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13(3):e296-9.
Petersen RC. Advancing discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length for replacing current dental composites and amalgam. J Nature Sci. 2017;3(2).
Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, Hupa L. Fiber glass–bioactive glass composite for bone replacing and bone anchoring implants. Dent Materials. 2015;31(4):371-81.
Lazar MA, Rotaru H, Bâldea I, Boşca AB, Berce CP, Prejmerean C, et al. Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of New Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(7):1694-9.
