Determinants of male involvement in partner's cervical cancer screening in Makueni County, Kenya

Authors

  • Ruth T. Wambua Department of Community Health and Reproductive Health Nursing, Kenyatta University, Kenya
  • Lister N. Onsongo Department of Community Health and Reproductive Health Nursing, Kenyatta University, Kenya
  • Eric M. Ndombi Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Kenyatta University, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232838

Keywords:

Cervical cancer screening, Spouse, Sociocultural, Socioeconomic, Demographic, Factors

Abstract

Background:  Cervical cancer is the fourth cause of cancer deaths globally and is ranked in Kenya as the second cause of cancer-related deaths among females. Men are crucial in minimizing cervical cancer burden. This study sought to establish the socio-cultural and economic factors determining male involvement in their partner's cervical cancer screening in Makueni County, Kenya.

Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional study was used to obtain quantitative and qualitative data from men using questionnaires. Participants were married men aged 18-64 who sought services at three mid-level rural hospitals in Makueni County. Three key Informant face-to-face interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferences. Qualitative data was analyzed through codes and themes.

Results:  The study included 291 men. Men's involvement in their partner's cervical cancer screening was low. Only 18% of the participants showed high involvement. The participants' mean age was 38.59 (SD±10.51). Younger men (median age=33 years) were significantly more involved than their older counterparts (median age=38 years) (U=4363, p=0.020). The level of male involvement was strongly linked to the rural area of residence (p=0.001) and the hospital where the respondents were interviewed (p=0.012). Other determining factors included employment status (p=0.004), educational level (p=0.000, and spousal screening history (p=0.000). The odds of male involvement were higher in men who understood their role in cervical cancer screening than those who did not (OR=4.550, 95% CI [1.307, 15.844], p=0.017).

Conclusions: Male involvement in their partner’s cervical cancer screening remains significantly low, and demographics and sociocultural factors are key to these poor trends.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Mathieu L, Isabelle S, Ahmedin J et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.

WHO. Kenya Cancer Statistics. The Global Cancer Observatory. 2021. Available at: http://gco.iarc.fr/ today/dat/factsheets/populations/404-kenya-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed on 3 June 2023.

Simelela PN. WHO global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem: An opportunity to make it a disease of the past. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2021;152:1-3.

Ministry of Health. Kenya-Cancer-Policy. Ministry of Health, Nairobi: Kenya. 2020.

Adegboyega A, Aleshire M, Dignan M, Jennifer H. Spousal support and knowledge related to cervical cancer screening: Are Sub-Saharan African immigrant men interested? Health Care Women Int. 2019;40(6):665-81.

Sharma S, Bhuvan KC, Khatri A. Factors influencing male participation in reproductive health: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:601.

Adewumi K, Oketch SY, Choi Y, Megan JH. Female perspectives on male involvement in a human-papillomavirus-based cervical cancer-screening program in western Kenya. BMC Womens Health 2019;19(1):107.

Kusumaningrum T. Men’s Participation to Support Early Detection of Cervical Cancer in Indonesia: A Literature Review. Conference: 8th International Nursing Conference on Education, Practice and Research Development in Nursing (INC 2017). 2017.

Binka C, Doku DT, Nyarko SH, Awusabo-Asare K. Male support for cervical cancer screening and treatment in rural Ghana. PLoS One. 2019;14.

Ngwenya D, Huang SL. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on cervical cancer and screening: a survey of men and women in Swaziland. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018;40:e343-50.

Rosser JI, Zakaras JM, Hamisi S, Megan JH. Men’s knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer screening in Kenya. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14;318.

Lewis S, Moucheraud C, Schechinger D, Misheck M, Ben AB, Hitler S et al. “A loving man has a very huge responsibility”: A mixed methods study of Malawian men’s knowledge and beliefs about cervical cancer. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1494.

Artiga S, Hinton E. Beyond health care: The role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity. Kaiser Family Foundation: The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. 2018.

Buchanan Lunsford N, Ragan K, Smith JL, Saraiya M, Aketchb M. Environmental and Psychosocial Barriers to and Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening in Kenya. Oncologist. 2017;22(2):173-81.

Binka C, Nyarko SH, Awusabo-Asare K, Doku DT. Barriers to the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment among Rural Women in Ghana. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6320938..

McFarland DM, Gueldner SM, Mogobe KD. Integrated Review of Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Nursing Scholarship. 2016;48:490-8.

Madhivanan P, Valderrama D, Krupp K, Ibanez G. Family and cultural influences on cervical cancer screening among immigrant Latinas in Miami-Dade County, USA. Cult Health Sex. 2016;18(6):71-22.

Onyenwenyi AOC, McHunu GG. Barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake among rural women in South West Nigeria: A qualitative study. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;24:22-6.

Matenga TFL, Zulu JM, Nkwemu S, Shankalala P, Hampanda K. Men’s perceptions of sexual and reproductive health education within the context of pregnancy and HIV in Zambia: a descriptive qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1354.

Major T, Koyabe B, Ntsayagae E, Monare B, Molwane O, Gabaitiria L. Norms and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening amongst women aged 25–49 in Botswana: A pilot study. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2018;9:141-7.

Darin-Mattsson A, Fors S, Kåreholt I. Different indicators of socioeconomic status and their relative importance as determinants of health in old age. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:173.

Broberg G, Wang J, Östberg AL, Adolfsson A, Nemes S, Sparén P et al. Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190171.

Khazaeian S, Kariman N, Ebadi A, Nasiri M. Effect of socio-economic factors on reproductive health in female heads of household: A cross-sectional study in Iran. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2018;12(12):QC06-9.

World Bank. Key Indicators International Poverty Line(%). World Bank. 2023

Darj E, Chalise P, Shakya S. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in Nepal: A qualitative study. Sexual Reproduct Healthcare. 2019;20:20-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-08

How to Cite

Wambua, R. T., Onsongo, L. N., & Ndombi, E. M. (2023). Determinants of male involvement in partner’s cervical cancer screening in Makueni County, Kenya. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 10(10), 3421–3429. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232838

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles