Psychological response and perception to lockdown among keralites during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Joyal Francis; Arppana  Thomas; Aleena S. Aboobacker

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233110

Authors

Joyal Francis KMCT Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Arppana Thomas KMCT Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Aleena S. Aboobacker KMCT Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233110

Keywords:

PDI, COVID-19, Mental health, Kerala

Abstract

Background: Kerala, which has a population density of 860 people per square kilometre, has been able to significantly curb the spread of COVID-19. This was a result of people in the State, politics, and social settings. Previous outbreaks showed that psychological symptoms could be severe and last longer than physical illness. This study examines the sources of information as well as the peritraumatic distress, attitude towards lockdown.

Methods: 2335 individuals under lockdown were given a 32-item questionnaire over the internet from March to August 2020. This covers demographic data, days spent in quarantine, attitude, and awareness, adherence to lockdown procedures, and PDI for measuring psychological distress. Overall score was calculated and associations found using the Chi-square test in SPSS 20.

Results: The average quarantine period lasted 10.12 days. 77.9% of individuals reported high stress, with a mean PDI score of 47.73. The psychological distress was more severe for those who were female and were placed in quarantine. The PDI score has associations with gender, education, health care access, loneliness, and the propensity to not adhere to lockdown measures. 89% of the responders expressed concern for their safety. We discovered that being in quarantine had a significant association with loneliness, concern about getting medical care, and resource accessibility.

Conclusions: The population had high levels of perceived stress during the pandemic. The detrimental effects of COVID-19 do not just fit into morbidity and mortality but have wider implications for mental health issues that require proper attention.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

WHO Director-General's statement on IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Available at: https://www.who.int/director-general/ speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus. Accessed on 20 February 2023.

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. Available at: https://www. who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19. Accessed on 20 February 2023.

Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.

Hossain MM, Sultana A, Purohit N. Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: A systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. Epidemiol Health. 2020.

Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatr. 2020;33 (2):1-3.

Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, et al. The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(5):302-11.

Nagarajappa R, Mahapatra I, Satyarup D, Mohanty S. Validation and assessment of COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index among Indian dental professionals. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2021;21: e0009.

Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima IAAS, Nunes JVAO, Saraiva JS, de Souza RI, et al. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112915.

Brailovskaia J, Miragall M, Margraf J, Herrero R, Baños RM. The relationship between social media use, anxiety and burden caused by coronavirus (COVID-19) in Spain. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(10):7441-7.

Vranken I, Brimmel N, Vandenbosch L, Trekels J. Television, news media, social media and adolescents' and young adults' violations of the COVID-19 lockdown measures: A prototype willingness model. Telemat Inform. 2022;70:101817.

DiGiovanni C, Conley J, Chiu D, Zaborski J. Factors influencing compliance with quarantine in Toronto during the 2003 SARS outbreak. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(4):265-72.

Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychol. 2020;39 (5):355-7.

Nasir M, Chowdhury AS, Zahan T. Self-medication during COVID-19 outbreak: a cross sectional online survey in Dhaka city. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 9(9):1325-30.

Elayeh E, Akour A, Haddadin RN. Prevalence and predictors of self-medication drugs to prevent or treat COVID-19: Experience from a Middle Eastern country. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75 (11):e14860.

Yang H, Ma J. How the COVID-19 pandemic impacts tobacco addiction: Changes in smoking behavior and associations with well-being. Addict Behav. 2021;119: 106917.