Vaginal versus caesarean delivery: an institutional experience from North India

Authors

  • Fiza Amin Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Tavseef Ahmad Tali Department of Radiation Oncology, Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Rifat Ara Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Huda Amin Department of Community Medicine, GMC Baramulla, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232475

Keywords:

Caesarean, Vaginal delivery, Maternal

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to recognise and evaluate the common maternal concerns that emerge following vaginal and caesarean deliveries.

Methods: In this retrospective study, hospital records of 300 pregnant patients who delivered in our hospital between July 2021 to December 2021 were analysed.

Results: In total of 300 patients, 110 had caesarean and 190 had vaginal delivery, 16 (14.5%) patients developed wound infection in caesarean and 6 (3.15%) in vaginal delivery, 12 patients developed post-partum haemorrhage after undergoing vaginal delivery and 6 patients after caesarean. There were 2 deaths reported in caesarean mode and only 1 in vaginal mode of delivery.

Conclusions: The study's findings indicate that caesarean had greater rates of maternal problems than vaginal delivery did.

References

Megregian M, Emeis C, Nieuwenhuijze M. The Impact of Shared Decision-Making in Perinatal Care: A Scoping Review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65:777-88.

Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. The Lancet. 2000;356:1677-80.

Colomar M, Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Long Q, Nion S, Bohren MA et al. Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences. Ortiz-Panozo E, editor. PLOS one. 2021;16:e0251072.

Fioretti B, Reiter M, Betra´n A, Torloni M. Googling caesarean section: a survey on the quality of the information available on the Internet. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:731-9.

Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu N, Bonotti A, Gibbons L, Sa´nchez A et al. Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies: Women’s preference for caesarean section: systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118:391-9.

Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Sau´de Pu´blica. 2017;51:105.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean section: clinical guideline CG132. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132. Accessed on March 20, 2023.

Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015.

Visco AG, Viswanathan M, Lohr KN, Wechter ME, Gartlehner G, Wu JM et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1517-29.

Ta¨htinen RM, Cartwright R, Tsui JF, Aaltonen RL, Aoki Y, Ca´rdenas JL et al. Long-term Impact of Mode of Delivery on Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:148-58.

Hankins GDV, Clark SM, Munn MB. Cesarean Section on Request at 39 Weeks: Impact on Shoulder Dystocia, Fetal Trauma, Neonatal Encephalopathy, and Intrauterine Fetal Demise. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:276-87.

Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:389-94.

Darmasseelane K, Hyde MJ, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Modi N. Mode of Delivery and Offspring Body Mass Index, Overweight and Obesity in Adult Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dewan A, editor. PLoS one. 2014;9:e87896.

Bager P, Wohlfahrt J, Westergaard T. Caesarean delivery and risk of atopy and allergic disesase: meta-analyses. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:634-42.

Anand N, Ajesh D, Kansara V, Patel S, Kagathra B, Patel R. Analysis of Trends in LSCS Rate and Indications of LSCS: A Study in a Medical College Hospital Gmers, Sola, Ahmedabad. Int J Phar Bio. 2015;2(1).

Rossen J, Okland I, Nilsen OB, Eggebo TM. Is there an increase of postpartum hemorrhage, and is severe hemorrhage associated with more frequent use of obstetric interventions? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1248-55.

Holm C, Langhoff-Roos J, Petersen KB, Norgaard A, Diness BR. Severe postpartum haemorrhage and mode of delivery: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119(5):596-604.

Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, Sands KE, Livingston J, Shtatland ES, Platt R. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(5):837-41.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

Amin, F., Tali, T. A., Ara, R., & Amin, H. (2023). Vaginal versus caesarean delivery: an institutional experience from North India. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 10(9), 3115–3118. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232475

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles