Assessment of district early intervention centres in India

Authors

  • Seemabanu M. Gafurjiwala Indian Institute of Public Health Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Yashaswini Kumar Indian Institute of Public Health Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • A. Y. Nirupama Indian Institute of Public Health Hyderabad, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233135

Keywords:

India, DEICs, Children, DALYs

Abstract

India has the largest number of children between the ages of 0-18 years globally with a child population of over 400 million. Developmental delays affect a minimum 10% of preschool children, preventing them from reaching their full development potential. The studies to estimate the prevalence of disability and its association with socio-demographic and quality of life may provide valuable information for optimizing how health and social welfare organizations deal with morbidities. The paper concludes with a discussion that reflects on the functionary status of district early intervention centre (DEICs) in India and finds out the gaps in the referral system of DEICs combined with a general reflection on the utility of the rapid cycle evaluation model used. There is the scope of the country-level uniformity of reporting of the data of children with delayed development and disabilities. The policymakers should notice that early intervention can reduce the burden of disease and disability‑adjusted life years (DALYs) and improve the quality of life of the next young generation of India.

 

References

Gaidhane A, Agarwal V, Wadnerkar Kamble M, Krishna D, Sahayraj MS, Bharathwaj A et al. Rapid-Cycle Evaluation in an Early Intervention Program for Children with Developmental Disabilities in South India: Optimizing Service Providers’ Quality of Work-Life, Family Program Engagement, and School Enrollment. Front Public Heal. 2020;1:567907.

Panigrahy BK, Swain A. A cross-sectional study to evaluate the functioning and infrastructure of mobile health teams and DEIC (district early intervention centre) at koraput district of odisha under rastriya bal swasthya karyakram (RBSK). 2019;5(1):165-72.

Parmar DS, Raghunath DD, Dixit DS, Bansal DSB, Patidar DA. A cross-sectional study to evaluate the functioning and infrastructure of DEIC, and client satisfaction Ujjain and Indore districts established under RBSK. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(09):92-4.

Chowdhury S, Chakraborty PP. Universal health coverage ‑ There is more to it than meets the eye. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2017;6(2):169-70.

Seitio-Kgokgwe O, Gauld RD, Hill PC, Barnett P. Development of the National Health Information Systems in Botswana: Pitfalls, prospects and lessons. Online J Public Health Inform. 2015;7(2):1-19.

Pagolu KR, Rao TR. Assessment of Institutional and management capacities against health conditions in District Early Intervention Centre (DEIC), Visakhapatnam. 2020;1-14.

Breman JG, Arita I. Article_5. Vol 4, Sports Coaching Review. 2015;1-23.

Shruthi H, Doddaiah SKC, Gopi A, Narayan Murthy MR, Bilimale AS. Assessment of beneficiary satisfaction at district early intervention centre, Mysuru district, Karnataka. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2021;8(9):4411.

Darivemula SB, Nagoor K, John KR, Kahn PS, Chittooru CS. Morbidity profile of children from birth to 18 years of age referred for intervention to the district early intervention centre in a District Hospital, Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64(1):55-9.

Medical Research Council, Pretoria SA. Formative research Report on RBSK. 2016;7:20.

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Walfare M of H and F. Annual report 2021-22 Department. Gastron ecuatoriana y Tur local. 1967;1(69):5-24.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Gafurjiwala, S. M., Kumar, Y., & Nirupama, A. Y. (2023). Assessment of district early intervention centres in India. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 10(10), 3938–3940. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233135

Issue

Section

Review Articles