Differences between ceramic and porcelain laminate veneers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20223571Keywords:
Ceramic, Porcelain, Laminate, VeneerAbstract
In dental care, treating anterior dentition esthetically has always been difficult. Numerous restorative solutions, including resin composites, all-ceramic crowns, and ceramic veneers, become accessible with the advancement of dental materials. In such situations, practitioners and patients should pick the most appropriate option to enhance oral health and aesthetic outcomes. Any substance made of non-metallic inorganic matter and fired at an elevated temperature is referred to as ceramics (pyrochemical process). Ceramics called glass ceramics are those that commence in a glassy phase and later devitrify to a partly or wholly crystalline form. Dental ceramics that most closely optically resemble the characteristics of real teeth are primarily glassy materials, which are derived primarily from triaxial porcelain compositions of feldspar, quartz, and kaolin. Glass-ceramics possess much more toughness and strength than porcelain but are also less translucent. Tougher and more durable ceramics, primarily yttrium stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals, have been developed recently (Y-TZP). Due to its limited translucency, Y-TZP presents a major drawback. A significant amount of current tooth structure must be removed in order to allow for a porcelain veneer that is wide enough to overlay an opaque zirconia base and replicate the optical characteristics of the surrounding natural teeth. Ceramic restoration effectiveness, in the end, relies on the material choice, production process, and restoration strategy.
Metrics
References
Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):333-52.
Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):353-70.
Bloom DR, Padayachy JN. Aesthetic changes with four anterior units. Br Dent J. 2006;200(3):135-8.
Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Phillips KM, Kois JC. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(6):374-82.
Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;1422:20S-4S.
Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):513-30.
Kelly JR. Ceramics in restorative and prosthetic dentistry. Annual Review of Materials Science. 1997;27(1):443-68.
Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(1):84-96.
McLaren EA, Figueira J. Updating Classifications of Ceramic Dental Materials: A Guide to Material Selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(6):400-5.
Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res. 1998;77(4):589-602.
Peterson IM, Wuttiphan S, Lawn BR, Chyung K. Role of microstructure on contact damage and strength degradation of micaceous glass-ceramics. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):80-9.
Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for dental applications: a review. Materials. 2010;3(1):351-68.
Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(4):469-75.
Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5-year prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(4):253-9.
Taskonak B, Sertgöz A. Two-year clinical evaluation of lithia-disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2006;22(11):1008-13.
Zhang Y, Lee JJ, Srikanth R, Lawn BR. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1201-8.
Höland W, Schweiger M, Watzke R, Peschke A, Kappert H. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(6):729-45.
Kern M, Sasse M, Wolfart S. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143(3):234-40.
Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(8):641-52.
Christensen GJ. Porcelain-fused-to-metal versus zirconia-based ceramic restorations, 2009. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(8):1036-9.
Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):299-307.
Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383-8.
Pang Z, Chughtai A, Sailer I, Zhang Y. A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1198-206.
Liu Y, Liu G, Wang Y, Shen JZ, Feng H. Failure modes and fracture origins of porcelain veneers on bilayer dental crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(2):147-50.
Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting. J Dent. 2012;40(6):527-30.
Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):552-7.
Sax C, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(3):183-202.
Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991;49(1):35-40.
Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(6):519-26.
Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(5):1668-77.
Amleh B, Neil Waddell J, Lyons K, Swain MV. Influence of veneering porcelain thickness and cooling rate on residual stresses in zirconia molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):271-80.
Baldassarri M, Stappert CF, Wolff MS, Thompson VP, Zhang Y. Residual stresses in porcelain-veneered zirconia prostheses. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):873-9.
Belli R, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Katte H, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. A photoelastic assessment of residual stresses in zirconia-veneer crowns. J Dent Res. 201;91(3):316-20.
Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, Edelhoff D, Naumann M. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dental materials. 2012;28(4):449-56.
Christensen R. Focus on: Monolithic crowns. Dent Today. 2013;32(3):22.
Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(8):557-66.
Zhang H, Li Z, Kim BN. Effect of alumina dopant on transparency of tetragonal zirconia. J Nanomat. 2012;2012.
Tong H, Tanaka CB, Kaizer MR, Zhang Y. Characterization of three commercial Y-TZP ceramics produced for their high-translucency, high-strength and high-surface area. Ceram Int. 2016;42(1 Pt B):1077-85.
Klimke J, Trunec M, Krell A. Transparent tetragonal yttria‐stabilized zirconia ceramics: influence of scattering caused by birefringence. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2011;94(6):1850-8.
Zeng K, Odén A, Rowcliffe D. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains. Int J Prostho. 1998;11(2).