Determination, implication, and satisfaction of shade selection in aesthetic dentistry
Keywords:Shade matching, Color matching, Cosmetic dentistry, Aesthetic dentistry
Delivering an aesthetic solution that proportionally complements the patient's neighboring teeth is crucial. In the discipline of cosmetic dentistry, qualities like surface form, translucency, and color are the most important factors for creating esthetic prostheses. The final color of translucent ceramic restorations is determined by many factors such as the thickness of the porcelain veneer, the thickness and color of the luting agents and the color of the underlying tooth structure. In order to the results to be accurate, homogenous, and predictable—all of which are crucial for cosmetic dentistry—color matching must be carried out in a methodical manner. Lighting control at the site, the surrounding environment, state of the teeth, patient positioning, time, and clinician proximity to the tooth, squint test, visual color guidelines, Vita Classical shade guide, Vita Toothguide 3D-Master, Chromascop, customized shade guides, and dentinal and extended shade guides are all considered when mapping shade and translucency. A sensor, a signals conditioner, and technology that allows the conversion of the signals into data usable in the dental laboratory or operatory make up the three components of every color-measuring instrument. Colorimetry, spectrophotometry, digital photography, hybrid equipment, and spectroradiometry comprise a few types of color measurement technology. Both print and electronic shade systems need to be used when choosing the right shade in order to create acceptable aesthetics. The practitioner and patient are both satisfied when the appropriate shade is matched, and the patient also has a more appealing appearance.
Borse S, Chaware SH. Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(2):131.
Özat P, Tuncel I, Eroğlu E. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection. J Oral Rehab. 2013;40(12):958-64.
Basavanna R, Gohil C, Shivanna V. Shade selection. Int J Oral Health Sci. 2013;3(1):26.
Bhat V, Prasad DK, Sood S, Bhat A. Role of colors in prosthodontics: Application of color science in restorative dentistry. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(6):804.
Clark EB. Tooth color selection. J Am Dent Assoc (1922). 1933;20(6):1065-73.
Sikri VK. Color: Implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dentistry. 2010;13(4):249.
Sulaiman A, Adebayo G. Most frequently selected shade for advance restoration delivered in a tertiary hospital facility in south western Nigeria. Ann Ibadan Postgrad Med. 2019;17(2):157-61.
Kalantari MH, Ghoraishian SA, Mohaghegh M. Evaluation of accuracy of shade selection using two spectrophotometer systems: Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot. Eur J Dentistry. 2017;11(02):196-200.
Hombesh M, Praveen B, Sinha HV, Prasanna B, Sachin B, Chandrashekar S. Two years survivability of VITA 3D master shade matching guides after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dentistry. 2019;22(3):275.
Parameswaran V, Anilkumar S, Lylajam S, Rajesh C, Narayan V. Comparison of accuracies of an intraoral spectrophotometer and conventional visual method for shade matching using two shade guide systems. The J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16(4):352.
Gómez‐Polo C, Gómez‐Polo M, Martínez Vázquez de Parga JA, Celemín‐Viñuela A. Clinical study of the 3D‐master color system among the Spanish population. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):708-15.
Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Jakstat H, Moldovan O, Schwarz S, Hassel AJ. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D‐master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D‐master. J Oral Rehab. 2010;37(11):860-5.
Rajan N, Rajan A, Singh G, Jindal L. Shade Selection–Basic for Esthetic Dentistry: Literature Review. Int J Contemp Res Rev. 2020;11(09).
Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodont Restorative Dentistry. 2003;23(5):467-80.
Paolone G, Orsini G, Manauta J, Devoto W, Putignano A. Composite shade guides and color matching. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9(2):164-82.
Todorov R, Peev T, Zlatev S. Shade guides used in the dental practice. J IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2020;26(2):3168-73.
Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dentistry. 2004;32:3-12.
Suganya SP, Manimaran P, Saisadan D, Kumar CD, Abirami D, Monnica V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(1):S319.
Ballard E, Metz MJ, Harris BT, Metz CJ, Chou JC, Morton D, et al. Satisfaction of Dental Students, Faculty, and Patients with Tooth Shade‐Matching Using a Spectrophotometer. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(5):545-53.
Jarad F, Russell M, Moss B. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J. 2005;199(1):43-9.
Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnston WM. Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. Dent Materials. 2006;22(6):553-9.
Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dentistry. 2010;38:e2-16.
Miyajiwala JS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Lakha TA. Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: A clinical evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(3):273.
Bayindir F, Kuo S, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;98(3):175-85.
Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E. The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;88(6):585-90.
Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, LeBeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011;105(2):83-90.
Koutayas SO, Kakaboura A, Hussein A, Strub JR. Colorimetric evaluation of the influence of five different restorative materials on the color of veneered densely sintered alumina. J Esthetic Restorative Dentistry. 2003;15(6):353-61.
Li Q, Yu H, Wang Y. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dent Materials. 2009;25(2):158-65.
Nakamura T, Saito O, Fuyikawa J, Ishigaki S. Influence of abutment substrate and ceramic thickness on the colour of heat‐pressed ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29(9):805-9.
Chu FC, Chow TW, Chai J. Contrast ratios and masking ability of three types of ceramic veneers. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;98(5):359-64.
Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83(4):412-7.
Shokry TE, Shen C, Elhosary MM, Elkhodary AM. Effect of core and veneer thicknesses on the color parameters of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;95(2):124-9.
Karaagaclioglu L, Yilmaz B. Influence of cement shade and water storage on the final color of leucite-reinforced ceramics. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33(4):386-91.
Azer SS, Ayash GM, Johnston WM, Khalil MF, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of esthetic core shades on the final color of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;96(6):397-401.
Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;82(2):143-9.
Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ, Antonson S, Anusavice K. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(4).
Odén A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998;80(4):450-6.
Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(7):503-10.
Johnston W, Kao E. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989;68(5):819-22.
Ragain Jr JC, Johnston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Research & Application: Endorsed by Inter‐Society Color Council, The Colour Group (Great Britain), Canadian Society for Color, Color Science Association of Japan, Dutch Society for the Study of Color, The Swedish Colour Centre Foundation, Colour Society of Australia, Centre Français de la Couleur. 2000;25(4):278-85.
Jarad F, Moss B, Youngson C, Russell M. The effect of enamel porcelain thickness on color and the ability of a shade guide to prescribe chroma. Dent Materials. 2007;23(4):454-60.
Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A. Resin cement color stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J Dentistry. 2011;39:e30-6.
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dentistry. 2000;28(3):163-77.
Nathanson D, Banasr F. Color stability of resin cements--an in vitro study. Pract Procedures Aesthetic Dentistry. 2002;14(6):449-55.
Hekimoğlu C, Anıl N, Etikan I. Effect of accelerated aging on the color stability of cemented laminate veneers. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(1).
Asmussen E. Factors affecting the color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1983;41(1):11-8.
Santos G, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Santos M. Hardening of dual-cure resin cements and a resin composite restorative cured with QTH and LED curing units. J Canad Dent Assoc. 2004;70(5):323-7.
Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo‐activation versus chemical or dual‐curing of resin‐based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehab. 2001;28(11):1022-8.
Braga R, Cesar P, Gonzaga C. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29(3):257-62.
Ghavam M, Amani-Tehran M, Saffarpour M. Effect of accelerated aging on the color and opacity of resin cements. Operative Dentistry. 2010;35(6):605-9.
Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(3).
Chadwick R, McCabe J, Carrick T. Rheological properties of veneer trial pastes relevant to clinical success. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):E11.